Skip to content
Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP partner Louis J. Blum.

Louis J. Blum

Partner

Clients who value problem avoidance know to get Mr. Blum involved early in the process for his common sense and big-picture focus. This approach has made him a trusted advisor and earned the confidence and respect of firm clients. Simply put, what matters most to Louis Blum is “maximizing our clients’ success.”

Attorneys

(858) 737-3100, Ext. 3037

(858) 737-3101

Louis Blum is a trial-tested litigator and experienced advisor who works with construction project owners, general contractors, subcontractors, and insureds to help them achieve their business goals.  Manufacturing, technology, development, financial, and professional services businesses have also come to rely on the same practical legal counsel.  Mr. Blum emphasizes a proactive approach to dispute avoidance and resolution based on early positioning and negotiation.  His trial, arbitration, and appeal experience informs advice, gives credibility to negotiations, and provides leverage and horsepower when needed.

Clients who value problem avoidance know to get Mr. Blum involved early in the process for his common sense and big-picture focus.  This approach has made him a trusted advisor and earned the confidence and respect of firm clients.  Simply put, what matters most to Louis Blum is “maximizing our clients’ success.”

DELAY, INEFFICIENCY, AND EXTRA WORK CLAIMS

General contractors and subcontractors on private and public works regularly suffer the monetary and operational pains caused by scope disputes, extra work, delay, acceleration, and productivity issues.  With a focus on dispute avoidance and maximizing leverage, Mr. Blum knows the right questions to ask, the right information to obtain, and which legal strategies to deploy regardless of the state of the project.  This helps to ease client frustrations, contain disputes, and consistently achieve positive outcomes.

FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS CLAIMS

In the heavily regulated public works environment, early assessment of the most practical strategies for your unresolved project issues is critical — especially if you are hoping to avoid headaches and unnecessary expense.  Whether he is evaluating a possible request for equitable adjustment, submitting a claim, or preparing for aggressive litigation, Mr. Blum embraces and takes ownership of client problems.

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS

Negotiation of key contract provisions requires advance knowledge of how language will be interpreted and used in litigation.  Mr. Blum has unique construction experience that allows him to strategically negotiate prime contracts for any type of public or private delivery method, including cost-plus, lease-leaseback, construction management, and design-build, as well as subcontracts for any type of project or trade.  Mr. Blum emphasizes efficient, practical advice on contract negotiation at every level.

CLAIM AND CLOSE-OUT NEGOTIATIONS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS

Navigating contractual dispute resolution, Public Contract Code and Government Code requirements, and evaluating the timing of claim submissions and strategy for resolution opportunities is vital to limiting cost overruns and project losses.  Years of experience in managing these problems provide Mr. Blum’s clients with the unique opportunity to resolve claims early or to properly set the stage for litigation when necessary.

COLLECTIONS: LIENS, STOP PAYMENT NOTICES, AND BOND CLAIMS

Avoiding mistakes and proper timing are vital in pursuing all available remedies for recovery of money owed on a construction project, whether the claim is disputed or undisputed.  Mr. Blum has worked on such matters on a daily basis and that translates to immediate, experienced advice.  He and the firm strive to deliver maximum net monetary benefits to our clients at every engagement.

BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL LITIGATION

In addition to Mr. Blum’s construction clientele, his litigation experience is often called upon by general businesses including manufacturing, technology, development, financial, and professional services companies.  This work involves business issues ranging from contract disputes including license, payment, and lease issues; partnership and ownership issues; and creditor claims and defense.  Always leading with common sense and an appreciation for maximizing return on investment, Mr. Blum is adept in bringing resolution and closure to most matters without the need for costly, time-consuming litigation.

INSURANCE COVERAGE

For general contractors, subcontractors, and other businesses facing coverage disputes caused by insurance carriers unwilling to pay or defend claims, Mr. Blum brings an abundance of practical expertise to the firm’s representation of insurance claims and defense matters.  His litigation skills and our aggressive approach tilt the playing field in your favor.  If you are receptive to legal strategies that could result in someone else paying your insurance bills, then it may be worth a phone call to Louis Blum.

COURSE-OF-PERFORMANCE COUNSEL

Large or experienced general contractors or subcontractors understand the value that comes from working with an experienced legal partner throughout the life of a project.  That Mr. Blum is so knowledgeable about construction company operations and industry practices make him ideally suited for this trusted role.  Moreover, the economic benefits of a project counsel relationship usually quell the concerns of cost-minded clients.

  • Construction litigation
  • Public works of improvement and government contracts, including projects with local public agencies, cities, counties, state agencies, and federal government
  • Delay, inefficiency, and extra work claims
  • Coordination with schedule, design, accounting, and subject matter experts on construction claims
  • Contract defaults
  • Surety obligations
  • Mechanic’s liens
  • Stop payment notices
  • Payment bond claims
  • Performance bond claims
  • Requests for equitable adjustments (REAs)
  • Contract Disputes Act claims
  • Miller Act claims
  • Counsel on specialized delivery methods, including lease-leaseback and construction management at-risk projects
  • Transactional matters specializing in the drafting and review of construction project agreements and public procurement compliance
  • Local, state, and federal bid protests
  • General business litigation
  • Insurance litigation and coverage
Design Build Contractor v. State DOT

The firm represented a design-build contractor in arbitration related to cost overruns and delays caused by the state’s failure to acquire essential land for a critical project component. The case was heard before a three-arbitrator panel. After nine days of hearings and testimony from 15 witnesses, the panel ruled in favor of the firm’s client, awarding a total of $3.25 million.

Counsel: P. Randolph Finch Jr.Louis J. Blum , and Thomas E. Diamond

Engineering Contractor v. City
The firm represented an engineering contractor in a lawsuit to recover delay and disruption costs for building a replacement bridge.  The municipality counter sued for $25 million claiming the bridge was defective and had to be replaced.  The lawsuit scope grew to include several design professionals implicated by differing site conditions, design issues, and permits related to in and out of water work.  After substantial written and oral discovery, followed by mediation, and shortly before a jury trial, the case settled for payment to the firm’s client of 95 percent of its demand.  The firm also successfully transferred defense costs related to the counterclaim to insurers of the project risks, substantially reducing its client’s litigation spend.

Counsel: P. Randolph Finch Jr. and Louis J. Blum

McGee v. Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC

The firm represented a lease-leaseback contractor performing work for the Torrance Unified School District.  A third party filed a lawsuit against the contractor and the District claiming the lease-leaseback agreements for two schools were illegal.  Both Balfour Beatty and the District challenged the complaint by demurrer, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety. The trial court dismissed the case.

The Second District Court of Appeal agreed with Balfour Beatty and the District, followed the plain language of Education Code Section 17406, and concluded competitive bidding was not required for a lease-leaseback contract at that time.  In so doing, the court expressly rejected the contrary holding in Davis v. Fresno Unified School District (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 261.  This was an important decision protecting contractors who provided lease-leaseback services at the request of public entities.

A copy of the published decision can be viewed here.

(2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 235

Counsel: Jason R. Thornton and Louis J. Blum

Private Works Prime Contractor v. Private Owner

The firm represented the prime contractor in a dispute with a Fortune 500 multi-national owner over construction of a flagship retail store.  The project was delayed — resulting in increased costs due to the delay and inefficiencies.  Each party claimed the other was responsible.  The dispute involved $28 million in claims between the parties.

Rigorous research and analysis made all the difference.

The firm sued the owner for the increased costs.  The owner initially refused to discuss a reasonable settlement and cross-complained against the client.  Pressure from the firm’s successful demurrer to the owner’s cross-complaint and substantiation of the client’s claims through analysis of terabytes of project records produced the desired effect.  Prior to costly depositions — and well short of trial — the firm obtained a favorable monetary settlement for the client.

Counsel: Jeffrey B. Baird, Louis J. Blum, and Daniel P. Scholz

California Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Construction, Inc. (2017)

The firm represented a lease-leaseback contractor performing work for the Mt. Diablo Unified School District.  A third party filed a lawsuit against the contractor and the District claiming the lease-leaseback agreement for HVAC modernization at fourteen campuses was illegal.  Both the contractor and the District challenged the complaint by demurrer, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety.  The trial court dismissed the case.

The First District Court of Appeal agreed with the contractor and the District and upheld the demurrer as to “all of the lease-leaseback related claims that attempt to engraft requirements on the transaction that are not part of the applicable Education Code.”  This was another important decision protecting contractors who provided lease-leaseback services at the request of public entities.

A copy of the published decision can be viewed here.

(2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 115

Counsel: Jason R. Thornton and Louis J. Blum

Arbitration Of Software Agreement

The firm’s client contacted with a software developer for a custom, cloud based software application to support the client’s business.  The developer failed to deliver working software despite the cost doubling from the original contract amount.  The firm demanded arbitration on behalf of the client, and the developer defended claiming the client had released all claims as part of a negotiated termination of the development contract.  The parties arbitrated the defense of release.  After a tentative ruling in favor of the firm’s client, the matter was mediated where it settled favorably for the client.

Counsel: Louis J. Blum

Settlement Of Wrongful Termination Of Retaining Wall Subcontractor

The firm represented a retaining wall subcontractor in a dispute over wrongful termination of the subcontractor’s contract. Subcontractor sought payment for work performed. The grading contractor defendant claimed completion costs. Before any litigation was required, the firm negotiated a settlement resulting in a substantial payment to the firm’s client.

Counsel: Louis J. Blum

Claim of Copyright Infringement

The firm’s construction client was sued for violation of copyright over the use of images on its website. The firm tendered to the client’s liability insurance carriers and negotiated with the carrier for settlement of the claim at no expense to the client.

Counsel: Louis J. Blum

Louis Blum is a trial-tested litigator and experienced advisor who works with construction project owners, general contractors, subcontractors, and insureds to help them achieve their business goals.  Manufacturing, technology, development, financial, and professional services businesses have also come to rely on the same practical legal counsel.  Mr. Blum emphasizes a proactive approach to dispute avoidance and resolution based on early positioning and negotiation.  His trial, arbitration, and appeal experience informs advice, gives credibility to negotiations, and provides leverage and horsepower when needed.

Clients who value problem avoidance know to get Mr. Blum involved early in the process for his common sense and big-picture focus.  This approach has made him a trusted advisor and earned the confidence and respect of firm clients.  Simply put, what matters most to Louis Blum is “maximizing our clients’ success.”

DELAY, INEFFICIENCY, AND EXTRA WORK CLAIMS

General contractors and subcontractors on private and public works regularly suffer the monetary and operational pains caused by scope disputes, extra work, delay, acceleration, and productivity issues.  With a focus on dispute avoidance and maximizing leverage, Mr. Blum knows the right questions to ask, the right information to obtain, and which legal strategies to deploy regardless of the state of the project.  This helps to ease client frustrations, contain disputes, and consistently achieve positive outcomes.

FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS CLAIMS

In the heavily regulated public works environment, early assessment of the most practical strategies for your unresolved project issues is critical — especially if you are hoping to avoid headaches and unnecessary expense.  Whether he is evaluating a possible request for equitable adjustment, submitting a claim, or preparing for aggressive litigation, Mr. Blum embraces and takes ownership of client problems.

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS

Negotiation of key contract provisions requires advance knowledge of how language will be interpreted and used in litigation.  Mr. Blum has unique construction experience that allows him to strategically negotiate prime contracts for any type of public or private delivery method, including cost-plus, lease-leaseback, construction management, and design-build, as well as subcontracts for any type of project or trade.  Mr. Blum emphasizes efficient, practical advice on contract negotiation at every level.

CLAIM AND CLOSE-OUT NEGOTIATIONS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS

Navigating contractual dispute resolution, Public Contract Code and Government Code requirements, and evaluating the timing of claim submissions and strategy for resolution opportunities is vital to limiting cost overruns and project losses.  Years of experience in managing these problems provide Mr. Blum’s clients with the unique opportunity to resolve claims early or to properly set the stage for litigation when necessary.

COLLECTIONS: LIENS, STOP PAYMENT NOTICES, AND BOND CLAIMS

Avoiding mistakes and proper timing are vital in pursuing all available remedies for recovery of money owed on a construction project, whether the claim is disputed or undisputed.  Mr. Blum has worked on such matters on a daily basis and that translates to immediate, experienced advice.  He and the firm strive to deliver maximum net monetary benefits to our clients at every engagement.

BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL LITIGATION

In addition to Mr. Blum’s construction clientele, his litigation experience is often called upon by general businesses including manufacturing, technology, development, financial, and professional services companies.  This work involves business issues ranging from contract disputes including license, payment, and lease issues; partnership and ownership issues; and creditor claims and defense.  Always leading with common sense and an appreciation for maximizing return on investment, Mr. Blum is adept in bringing resolution and closure to most matters without the need for costly, time-consuming litigation.

INSURANCE COVERAGE

For general contractors, subcontractors, and other businesses facing coverage disputes caused by insurance carriers unwilling to pay or defend claims, Mr. Blum brings an abundance of practical expertise to the firm’s representation of insurance claims and defense matters.  His litigation skills and our aggressive approach tilt the playing field in your favor.  If you are receptive to legal strategies that could result in someone else paying your insurance bills, then it may be worth a phone call to Louis Blum.

COURSE-OF-PERFORMANCE COUNSEL

Large or experienced general contractors or subcontractors understand the value that comes from working with an experienced legal partner throughout the life of a project.  That Mr. Blum is so knowledgeable about construction company operations and industry practices make him ideally suited for this trusted role.  Moreover, the economic benefits of a project counsel relationship usually quell the concerns of cost-minded clients.

  • Construction litigation
  • Public works of improvement and government contracts, including projects with local public agencies, cities, counties, state agencies, and federal government
  • Delay, inefficiency, and extra work claims
  • Coordination with schedule, design, accounting, and subject matter experts on construction claims
  • Contract defaults
  • Surety obligations
  • Mechanic’s liens
  • Stop payment notices
  • Payment bond claims
  • Performance bond claims
  • Requests for equitable adjustments (REAs)
  • Contract Disputes Act claims
  • Miller Act claims
  • Counsel on specialized delivery methods, including lease-leaseback and construction management at-risk projects
  • Transactional matters specializing in the drafting and review of construction project agreements and public procurement compliance
  • Local, state, and federal bid protests
  • General business litigation
  • Insurance litigation and coverage
Design Build Contractor v. State DOT

The firm represented a design-build contractor in arbitration related to cost overruns and delays caused by the state’s failure to acquire essential land for a critical project component. The case was heard before a three-arbitrator panel. After nine days of hearings and testimony from 15 witnesses, the panel ruled in favor of the firm’s client, awarding a total of $3.25 million.

Counsel: P. Randolph Finch Jr.Louis J. Blum , and Thomas E. Diamond

Engineering Contractor v. City
The firm represented an engineering contractor in a lawsuit to recover delay and disruption costs for building a replacement bridge.  The municipality counter sued for $25 million claiming the bridge was defective and had to be replaced.  The lawsuit scope grew to include several design professionals implicated by differing site conditions, design issues, and permits related to in and out of water work.  After substantial written and oral discovery, followed by mediation, and shortly before a jury trial, the case settled for payment to the firm’s client of 95 percent of its demand.  The firm also successfully transferred defense costs related to the counterclaim to insurers of the project risks, substantially reducing its client’s litigation spend.

Counsel: P. Randolph Finch Jr. and Louis J. Blum

McGee v. Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC

The firm represented a lease-leaseback contractor performing work for the Torrance Unified School District.  A third party filed a lawsuit against the contractor and the District claiming the lease-leaseback agreements for two schools were illegal.  Both Balfour Beatty and the District challenged the complaint by demurrer, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety. The trial court dismissed the case.

The Second District Court of Appeal agreed with Balfour Beatty and the District, followed the plain language of Education Code Section 17406, and concluded competitive bidding was not required for a lease-leaseback contract at that time.  In so doing, the court expressly rejected the contrary holding in Davis v. Fresno Unified School District (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 261.  This was an important decision protecting contractors who provided lease-leaseback services at the request of public entities.

A copy of the published decision can be viewed here.

(2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 235

Counsel: Jason R. Thornton and Louis J. Blum

Private Works Prime Contractor v. Private Owner

The firm represented the prime contractor in a dispute with a Fortune 500 multi-national owner over construction of a flagship retail store.  The project was delayed — resulting in increased costs due to the delay and inefficiencies.  Each party claimed the other was responsible.  The dispute involved $28 million in claims between the parties.

Rigorous research and analysis made all the difference.

The firm sued the owner for the increased costs.  The owner initially refused to discuss a reasonable settlement and cross-complained against the client.  Pressure from the firm’s successful demurrer to the owner’s cross-complaint and substantiation of the client’s claims through analysis of terabytes of project records produced the desired effect.  Prior to costly depositions — and well short of trial — the firm obtained a favorable monetary settlement for the client.

Counsel: Jeffrey B. Baird, Louis J. Blum, and Daniel P. Scholz

California Taxpayers Action Network v. Taber Construction, Inc. (2017)

The firm represented a lease-leaseback contractor performing work for the Mt. Diablo Unified School District.  A third party filed a lawsuit against the contractor and the District claiming the lease-leaseback agreement for HVAC modernization at fourteen campuses was illegal.  Both the contractor and the District challenged the complaint by demurrer, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety.  The trial court dismissed the case.

The First District Court of Appeal agreed with the contractor and the District and upheld the demurrer as to “all of the lease-leaseback related claims that attempt to engraft requirements on the transaction that are not part of the applicable Education Code.”  This was another important decision protecting contractors who provided lease-leaseback services at the request of public entities.

A copy of the published decision can be viewed here.

(2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 115

Counsel: Jason R. Thornton and Louis J. Blum

Arbitration Of Software Agreement

The firm’s client contacted with a software developer for a custom, cloud based software application to support the client’s business.  The developer failed to deliver working software despite the cost doubling from the original contract amount.  The firm demanded arbitration on behalf of the client, and the developer defended claiming the client had released all claims as part of a negotiated termination of the development contract.  The parties arbitrated the defense of release.  After a tentative ruling in favor of the firm’s client, the matter was mediated where it settled favorably for the client.

Counsel: Louis J. Blum

Settlement Of Wrongful Termination Of Retaining Wall Subcontractor

The firm represented a retaining wall subcontractor in a dispute over wrongful termination of the subcontractor’s contract. Subcontractor sought payment for work performed. The grading contractor defendant claimed completion costs. Before any litigation was required, the firm negotiated a settlement resulting in a substantial payment to the firm’s client.

Counsel: Louis J. Blum

Claim of Copyright Infringement

The firm’s construction client was sued for violation of copyright over the use of images on its website. The firm tendered to the client’s liability insurance carriers and negotiated with the carrier for settlement of the claim at no expense to the client.

Counsel: Louis J. Blum

Clients who value problem avoidance know to get Mr. Blum involved early in the process for his common sense and big-picture focus. This approach has made him a trusted advisor and earned the confidence and respect of firm clients. Simply put, what matters most to Louis Blum is “maximizing our clients’ success.”

Attorneys

(858) 737-3100, Ext. 3037

(858) 737-3101

  • Construction Law
    • Claims & Disputes
    • Local Agency, Municipal & State Contracts
    • Federal Procurement & Claims
    • Project Counsel
    • Prime Contracts & Subcontracts
    • Collections
  • Business & Commercial Litigation
  • Insurance Defense & Coverage
  • California: State Courts
  • U.S. District Courts of California: Central, Southern
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • University of San Diego School of Law, J.D., cum laude
    • Order of the Coif
    • Law Review; his comment “Mixed Signals: Comparative Analysis in Constitutional Adjudication” published in Volume 39, Winter 2002 edition
    • CALI (AmJur) Award for the highest achievement in Products Liability and Pre-Trial Practice
  • Washington University, St. Louis, B.A., Economics
  • State Bar of California
  • San Diego Super Lawyer for Construction Litigation by Super Lawyers Magazine in 2018–2020, and 2022-2024
  • San Diego Rising Star for Construction Litigation by Super Lawyers Magazine in 2015
  • Board of Directors, San Diego County Taxpayers Association

Mr. Blum is an accomplished public speaker and regularly addresses the construction community on a range of training and educational topics, including:

How To Prove And Recover Your Losses: Change Orders And Claims

Latest Trends For Recovery Of Lost Productivity And Delay Claims

Back To Top