Skip to content
Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP attorney Matthew D. Seeley.

Matthew D. Seeley

Attorney

Matt’s strong work ethic, attention to detail, and team-oriented nature fit right in at Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP.  He is also keenly aware of our clients’ propensity to focus on the business of construction and getting the job done. 

Attorneys

(858) 737-3100, Ext. 3030

(858) 737-3101

Matthew (Matt) Seeley is a litigator who works with business owners, in-house counsel, project executives, and managers to provide legal advice focused on construction and business law. Clients include general contractors, subcontractors, engineering firms, and owners.

Matt’s practice involves complex and large-scale public and private works, owner/ general contractor disputes, general/subcontractor disputes, joint-venture disputes, False Claims Act litigation, qui tam/whistleblower claims, contract defaults, surety bond and Miller Act claims, public bidding and bid protests, subcontractor substitutions, and lien law. His practice also includes trademarks, contract negotiations, and other general business litigation such as breach of contract actions, commercial disputes, and more.

Matt’s strong work ethic, attention to detail, and team-oriented nature fit right in at Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP. He is keenly aware of our clients’ propensity to focus on the business of construction and getting the job done. It is also why Matt’s ability to work efficiently is welcomed by clients seeking to achieve cost-effective objectives.

Matt received his law degree from the University of San Diego where he graduated Magna Cum Laude, was awarded the Dean’s Outstanding Scholarship, and was a member of the mock trial team. Matt began his career at Finch Thornton & Baird LLP as a law clerk and also spent a semester of law school at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California. Matt earned his undergraduate degree in Political Science from the University of Washington.

After over three years as an attorney in our primary San Diego office, Matt moved home to Washington state to assist the firm with opening its first Seattle-area office. Matt now practices in both Washington and California.

PUBLIC BIDDING AND BID PROTESTs

Matt represents general contractors during the bidding and award process on a variety of public works projects. Matt understands the intricacies of public bidding laws and the bid protest process. His practice has focused on both filing bid protests and defending against bid protests on multiple types of public works projects including hard bid contracts, lease-leaseback contracts, and best-value contracts.

GENERAL LITIGATION

For businesses and individuals, Matt delivers legal counsel, practical advice, and aggressive representation to general litigation matters. These include breach of contract actions, product and services contract issues, home construction disputes, neighbor disputes, and more. Matt’s ability to adapt arguments for novel factual circumstances benefit our clients’ interests. Pre-litigation resolution of claims helps to minimize the duration and cost of legal services necessary.

MECHANIC’S LIEN, STOP PAYMENT NOTICE, AND BOND CLAIMS

The need for fair and prompt resolution of payment claims are regular occurrences for general contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers, and sureties. Each has their own set of priorities, too. To make sense of it all demands knowledge of the statutory requirements for making claims and the provisions that allow for withholding funds when appropriate. Fully understanding the details of claims brought against firm clients is imperative. From aggressively fighting trumped-up or illegitimate claims, to getting subcontractors and suppliers paid, to ensuring equitable distribution of claims among the surety or co-sureties, Matt provides valuable assistance to accomplish your goals.

Federal Procurement and CLAIMS

The highly regulated federal construction domain presents frequent challenges to both federal prime contractors and subcontractors.  Payment disputes with the government or between subcontractors and prime contractors are common.  Matt works with contractors on issues relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulations, the Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) process, and the Contract Disputes Act and Miller Act. 

  • Construction litigation
  • Public works of improvement and government contracts, including projects with local public agencies,
    cities, counties, state agencies, and federal government
  • Delay, inefficiency, and extra work claims
  • Surety obligations
  • Mechanic’s liens
  • Stop payment notices
  • Payment bond claims
  • Performance bond claims
  • Transactional matters specializing in the drafting and review of construction project agreements and public procurement compliance
  • Local, state, and federal bid protests
  • General business litigation
Firm Represents Desalination Developer

The firm played central role in representing the lead developer and operator in negotiation of a $204 Million Design-Build-Operate Maintain contract for a seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant.  Under the contract, the firm’s client will develop, permit, pilot, design, and construct the facility during the first 44 months of the project, and after commissioning, will operate and maintain the plant for the following 20 years and potentially during two five-year optional extensions.

Counsel: Daniel P. Scholz and Matthew D. Seeley

Successful Defense of Bid Protest – Client Awarded $4.5 Million Contract

The firm’s client was the low bidder on a multi-million dollar public works project involving improvements on a state highway for Caltrans.  The third-lowest bidder protested, contending that the client’s bid was materially unbalanced and contained an unwaivable error related to listing an incorrect bid item number on the DVBE form.

The firm met Caltran’s short deadline for response and successfully defended against multiple protest letters from the third-lowest bidder.  Based on the firm’s arguments, Caltrans denied the protest, and the contract, valued at approximately $4.5 million, was awarded to the firm’s client.

Counsel: P. Randolph Finch Jr., Daniel P. Scholz, and Matthew D. Seeley

General Contractor Awarded Contract After Bid Protest

The firm’s client was the second-low bidder on a public works contract for a Southern California city.  In determining the lowest bidder, the city failed to apply its Local Business Preference Program adjustment to the client’s bid.  The city’s program allowed for a 5 percent reduction to bids submitted by qualified local businesses.  Application of the Local Business Preference Program’s 5 percent reduction to the client’s bid made it the lowest bid.

ATTORNEY INVOLVEMENT GETS THE CITY’S ATTENTION.

The client initially protested the unfavorable contract award themselves.  After the city failed to respond, the client turned to Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP.

The firm’s attorneys successfully protested the city’s decision not to apply the 5 percent reduction to the client’s bid.  By identifying the intent behind the city’s Local Business Preference Program, the client’s qualifications for the program, and the city’s failure to strictly follow its municipal code, the city had no option but to accept the protest — and our client’s bid.  Without so much as a hearing on the matter, the city reversed course and awarded the contract to the firm’s client.

Counsel: Daniel P. Scholz and Matthew D. Seeley

Matthew (Matt) Seeley works with in-house counsel, business owners, project executives, and managers to provide legal advice focused on construction law and real property. This includes matters involving public and private construction claims and disputes, insurance coverage, real estate, and commercial litigation. Clients include general contractors, subcontractors, engineering firms, and owners.

Matt’s strong work ethic, attention to detail, and team-oriented nature fit right in at Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP.  He is keenly aware of our clients’ propensity to focus on the business of construction and getting the job done.  It is also why Matt’s ability to work efficiently is welcomed by clients seeking to achieve cost-effective objectives.

CLAIMS and disputes

Delays and disputes over contract interpretation, work delays, breach by subcontractors, and not being paid by owners are common.  Matt understands that keeping critical subcontractors working on a project and minimizing the harmful effects of work slow-downs, stoppages, or litigation are part of an effective legal strategy. 

MECHANIC’S LIEN, STOP PAYMENT NOTICE, AND BOND CLAIMS

Matt represents business and residential property owners on a variety of matters including tenant disputes, real estate transactions, and more.  Attention to detail, strong research and writing skills, and an aptitude for innovative legal strategies serve Matt — and the firm’s clients — very well.

Federal Procurement and CLAIMS

The highly regulated federal construction domain presents frequent challenges to both federal prime contractors and subcontractors.  Payment disputes with the government or between subcontractors and prime contractors are common.  Matt works with contractors on issues relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulations, the Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) process, and the Contract Disputes Act and Miller Act. 

  • Construction litigation
  • Public works of improvement and government contracts, including projects with local public agencies,
    cities, counties, state agencies, and federal government
  • Delay, inefficiency, and extra work claims
  • Surety obligations
  • Mechanic’s liens
  • Stop payment notices
  • Payment bond claims
  • Performance bond claims
  • Transactional matters specializing in the drafting and review of construction project agreements and public procurement compliance
  • Local, state, and federal bid protests
  • General business litigation
Firm Represents Desalination Developer

The firm played central role in representing the lead developer and operator in negotiation of a $204 Million Design-Build-Operate Maintain contract for a seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant.  Under the contract, the firm’s client will develop, permit, pilot, design, and construct the facility during the first 44 months of the project, and after commissioning, will operate and maintain the plant for the following 20 years and potentially during two five-year optional extensions.

Counsel: Daniel P. Scholz and Matthew D. Seeley

Successful Defense of Bid Protest – Client Awarded $4.5 Million Contract

The firm’s client was the low bidder on a multi-million dollar public works project involving improvements on a state highway for Caltrans.  The third-lowest bidder protested, contending that the client’s bid was materially unbalanced and contained an unwaivable error related to listing an incorrect bid item number on the DVBE form.

The firm met Caltran’s short deadline for response and successfully defended against multiple protest letters from the third-lowest bidder.  Based on the firm’s arguments, Caltrans denied the protest, and the contract, valued at approximately $4.5 million, was awarded to the firm’s client.

Counsel: P. Randolph Finch Jr., Daniel P. Scholz, and Matthew D. Seeley

General Contractor Awarded Contract After Bid Protest

The firm’s client was the second-low bidder on a public works contract for a Southern California city.  In determining the lowest bidder, the city failed to apply its Local Business Preference Program adjustment to the client’s bid.  The city’s program allowed for a 5 percent reduction to bids submitted by qualified local businesses.  Application of the Local Business Preference Program’s 5 percent reduction to the client’s bid made it the lowest bid.

ATTORNEY INVOLVEMENT GETS THE CITY’S ATTENTION.

The client initially protested the unfavorable contract award themselves.  After the city failed to respond, the client turned to Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP.

The firm’s attorneys successfully protested the city’s decision not to apply the 5 percent reduction to the client’s bid.  By identifying the intent behind the city’s Local Business Preference Program, the client’s qualifications for the program, and the city’s failure to strictly follow its municipal code, the city had no option but to accept the protest — and our client’s bid.  Without so much as a hearing on the matter, the city reversed course and awarded the contract to the firm’s client.

Counsel: Daniel P. Scholz and Matthew D. Seeley

Matt’s strong work ethic, attention to detail, and team-oriented nature fit right in at Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP.  He is also keenly aware of our clients’ propensity to focus on the business of construction and getting the job done. 

Attorneys

(858) 737-3100

(858) 737-3101

Rebekah E. Romero
Legal Secretary
  • Construction Law
    • Claims & Disputes
    • Local Agency, Municipal & State Contracts
    • Federal Procurement & Claims
    • Prime Contracts & Subcontracts
    • Real Estate
    • Corporate
  • Business & Commercial Litigation
  • Business & Commercial Transactions
  • California: State Courts
  • U.S. District Courts of California: Northern, Southern, and Central
  • Washington: State Courts
  • University of San Diego School of Law, J.D., magna cum laude
    • Order of the Coif
    • Dean’s Outstanding Scholarship Recipient
    • National Mock Trial Team
    • Journal of Climate & Energy Law
  • University of Washington, B.A., Political Science
    • Dean’s List
    • National Society of Collegiate Scholars
  • State Bar of California
  • U.S. District Courts of California:
    Northern, Southern
  • Washington: State Courts
Back To Top